Personal Interviews and Features

• European Science-Media Hub (2023) Peer pressure, social media, mainstream science
• ScienceGuide (2018, NL) Spreken over een 'replicatiecrisis' is onjuist en schadelijk
• Retraction Watch (2018, USA) The retraction process needs work. Is there a better way?
• BNR Nieuwsradio (2017, NL) Grote wetenschapsbladen overdrijven een beetje also on Podcast
• Retraction Watch Q&A (2017, USA) Authors who retract for honest error say they aren't penalized as a result.
• ORF radio (2016, AT)
• Le Devoir (2014, CA) Nos chercheurs sont-ils intègres?
• Deutschlandradio (2014, DE) Zwischen wissenschaftlichem Fehlverhalten und unbeabsichtigten Fehlern (text and audio of the radio interview, both in German)
• BBC Radio 4 (2014) Everything we know is wrong, Radio documentary.
• Radio3 Scienza (2014) Contrordine, scienziati - radio interview: downloadable podcast
• Nature Podcast (2013, UK) Peer pressure
• RAI (Radio Televisione Italiana) RadioTre Scienza (2013, IT) Il caso di Diederik Stapel
• Radio24 Moebius (2012, IT) Diederik sTapel
• ABC National (Australia Broadcasting Corporation) (2010, UK) Publish or perish: scientists under pressure
• Radio Citta Fujiko - Caccia al fotone (2011, IT) Pubblica o muori

Top

Representative media coverage of my work

• Nature (2023) Can giant surveys of scientists fight misinformation on COVID, climate change and more?
• Wired (2023) Scientific Fraud Is Slippery to Catch—but Easier to Combat
• AboutPharma (2023) La scienza che trucca le carte: perché il “caso” Schillaci riapre una questione mai chiusa
• Science (2022) ‘Zombie papers’ just won’t die. Retracted papers by notorious fraudster still cited years later
• Quillette (2021) Lockdown Scepticism Was Never a ‘Fringe’ Viewpoint
• Times Higher Education (2018, UK) Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis?
• Times Higher Education (2018, UK) Claims that reproducibility crisis 'overblown' spark debate
• The Economist (2018, UK) Are research papers less accurate and truthful than in the past?
• Daily Kos (2018, US) Is there a reproducability crisis?
• Times Higher Education (2017, UK) Developing nations 'at higher risk' of research misconduct
• BuzzFeed (2017, USA) The More Widely Cited A Study Is, The More Likely It Is To Exaggerate, Says This Study
• The Washington Post (2017, USA) How biased is science, really?
• CBC News (2017, CA) A second look at bias in science
• Sirp (2017, EE) Väärkäitumist teaduses saab mõistlikult vähendada
• Novaator (2017, EE) Väärkäitumist teaduses saab mõistlikult vähendada
• Ars technica (2017, USA) Analysis of meta-analyses identifies where sciences' real problems lie
• The Scientist (2017, USA) Qualities Tied to Potential Scientific Bias
• RetractionWatch (2017, USA) What leads to bias in the scientific literature? new study tries to answer
• GenomeWeb (2017, USA) All the biases
• Wissenschaft (2017, DE) Wissenschaft: Verzerrte Daten?
• PhysOrg (2017, Web) Studies of scientific bias targeting the right problems, study finds
• Retraction Watch (2016, USA) What does "reproducibility" mean? New paper seeks to standardize the lexicon
• Stat (2016, USA) Why science would benefit from being self-refereed
• Retraction Watch (2016, USA) Researchers' productivity hasn't increased in a century, study suggests
• Retraction Watch (2016, USA) Should there be a way to "self-retract" for honest error?
• Times Higher Education (2015, UK) Paper disputes causes of research misconduct
• Retraction Watch (2015, USA) Pressure to publish not to blame for misconduct, says new study
• Deutschlandradio (2014, DE) Zwischen wissenschaftlichem Fehlverhalten und unbeabsichtigten Fehlern (text and audio of the radio interview, both in German)
• University Post (2014, DK) How convenient! 9 out of 10 scientific conclusions on target. (original in Danish)
• The Economist (2013, UK) Trouble at the lab
• Science Careers (2013, USA) Your data, warts and all
• Nature Nanotechnology (2013, UK) Report the awful truth! and
  It's all about data
• MyScienceWork (2013, USA) A hierarchy of disciplines for "a better science"
• Nature (2013, UK) US behavioural research studies skew positive
• Popular Science (2013, UK) Why Do U.S. Behavioral Science Researchers Keep Skewing Their Results?
• Science News (2013, USA) Behavioral research may overstate results
• The Guardian (2012, UK) False positives: fraud and misconduct are threatening scientific research
• Nature (2012, UK) Replication studies: Bad copy
• Nature Physics (2011, UK) Less room for failure
• USA Today (2011. USA) File drawer effect: Science studies neglecting negative results
• Nature Physics (2010, UK) Hierarchy of sciences: How hard is physics?
• Times Higher Education (2010, UK) 'Publish or perish' culture distorting research
• The Economist (2009, UK) Liar! Liar!

Top

Recent media appearances

• LA Times (2023) A climate scientist wanted to start a debate in academia. He set off a bigger firestorm
• Science (2023) Possible misconduct found in papers from Italian minister of health
• Science (2023) Possible misconduct found in papers from Italian minister of health
• Nature (2021) 8% of researchers in Dutch survey have falsified or fabricated data
• Science (2021) Large survey finds questionable research practices are common
• Science (2021) What is research misconduct? European countries can't agree
• Nature (2019) Highlight negative results to improve science
• Science (2018) Rethinking retractions
• Science (2018) What a massive database of retracted papers reveals about science publishing's ‘death penalty'
• Nature Index (2021) Researchers' publication rates don't decline as they age
• The Debrief (2021) Does 'Oumuamua Prove Science Doesn't Want to Find Aliens?
• Chemistry world (2020) Junior researchers less likely to blow the whistle on research misconduct
• Chemistry world (2019) Study of misconduct suggests first author should be guarantor for a paper's accuracy
• Nature Index (2017) Female researchers add their superiors as authors
• Times HIgher Education (2017, UK) Rise of the research-bots: AI software that writes your papers for you
• Times HIgher Education (2017, UK) Survey finds high levels of research misconduct in Middle East
• Times Higher Education (2017, UK) Journals' statistics rules 'help tackle reproducibility crisis'
• Maisonneuve, (2016, CA) Litmus test
• Upsala Nya Tidning, (2016, SE) Fusket ett komplext problem
• Retraction Watch (2016, USA) Have 1 in 5 UK academics fabricated data?
• CNR-Web (2016, IT) Etica della scienza per una ricerca più virtuosa
• Corriere della Sera (2016, IT) Veronesi: «La scienza corre in fretta Serve subito una riflessione etica»
• Science Careers (2016, USA) Responsible research guidelines for the global scientist
• Nature (2015, USA) Smart software spots statistical errors in psychology papers
• Science (2015, USA) Register your study as a new publication option
• The Atlantic (2015, USA) Can futures markets save science?
• FiveThirtyEight (2015, USA) Science Isn't Broken
• Newsworks (2015, USA) Refraiming failure in the quest for scientific truth
• Nature (2015, UK) First results from psychology's largest reproducibility test
• Research Professional (2015, UK) Keeping House
• Nature (2015, UK) Danish court quashes ruling against physiologist
• Nature (2014, UK) Peer review - reviewed
• Le Devoir (2014, Canada) Nos chercheurs sont-ils intègres?
• Nature (2014, UK) Social sciences suffer from severe publication bias
• BBC Radio 4 (2014, UK) Everything we know is wrong, Radio documentary.
• Chinese Social Sciences Today (2014) ???????????????
• RetractionWatch (2014, USA) How often do Economists commit misconduct?
• RetractionWatch (2014, USA) Barriers to retraction may impede correction of the literature
• ??????????? China Youth Daily (2014) ??????????? ????????????
• RetractionWatch (2014) How common is scientific misconduct in Nigeria?
• RetractionWatch (2014) Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign": New study makes the case
• Nature Careers(2014, UK) Retractions: A clean slate
• Nature (2013, UK) Peer reviewers urged to speak their mind
• Nature Podcasts (2013, UK) Peer pressure
• National Geographic (2013, UK) New Centre Aims to Make Science More Open and Reliable
• Newsweek (2013, USA) Awash in False Findings
• Il manifesto (2013, IT) Una Cattiva Scienza
• Videnskab (2013, DK) Betalingstidsskrifter v�gter 'sexy science' over n�jagtighed
• Die Zeit (2013, DE)
• Nature (2013, UK)
• RetractionWatch (2013, USA)
• Guokr (2013, CN)
• Science (2013, USA)
• BBC Radio (2013, UK) Inside Science
• EOS (2013, NL)
• The Guardian (2013, UK)
• De Morgen (2013, BE)
• Quebec Science (2013, CA)
• Columbia Journalism Review, (2013, USA) Rooting out bad science
• NRC Handelsblad (2013), Netherlands, Sommige disciplines zijn gevoelig voor gesjoemel
• Scientific American MIND (2013, USA)
• EOS (2013, NL)
• Science-Business Exchange (2013)
• The Scientist (2013, CA)
• Science (2013, USA)
• Nature (2013, UK)
• LiveScience (2013, USA)
• Nature (2013, UK)

Top